Paul's Online Math Notes
Algebra Trig Review / Algebra / Exponents   

On August 21 I am planning to perform a major update to the site. I can't give a specific time in which the update will happen other than probably sometime between 6:30 a.m. and 8:00 a.m. (Central Time, USA). There is a very small chance that a prior commitment will interfere with this and if so the update will be rescheduled for a later date.

I have spent the better part of the last year or so rebuilding the site from the ground up and the result should (hopefully) lead to quicker load times for the pages and for a better experience on mobile platforms. For the most part the update should be seamless for you with a couple of potential exceptions. I have tried to set things up so that there should be next to no down time on the site. However, if you are the site right as the update happens there is a small possibility that you will get a "server not found" type of error for a few seconds before the new site starts being served. In addition, the first couple of pages will take some time to load as the site comes online. Page load time should decrease significantly once things get up and running however.

August 7, 2018

Algebra Trig Review
  Next Chapter Trigonometry
Algebra (Introduction) Previous Section   Next Section Absolute Value
Exponents    [Show All Solutions]

Simplify each of the following as much as possible.



Show Solution

All of these problems make use of one or more of the following properties.



This particular problem only uses the first property.



Remember that the y’s in the last two terms can’t be combined!  You can only combine terms that are products or quotients.  Also, while this would be an acceptable and often preferable answer in a calculus class an algebra class would probably want you to get rid of the negative exponents as well.  In this case your answer would be.



The 2 will stay in the numerator of the first term because it doesn’t have a negative exponent.



Show Solution



Not much to this solution other than just adding the exponents.



Show Solution



Note that you could also have done the following (probably is easier….).



In the second case I first canceled an x before doing any simplification.


In both cases the 2 stays in the denominator.  Had I wanted the 2 to come up to the numerator with the x I would have used  in the denominator.  So watch parenthesis!



Show Solution

There are a couple of ways to proceed with this problem.  I’m going to first simplify the inside of the parenthesis a little.  At the same time I’m going to use the last property above to get rid of the minus sign on the whole thing.



Now bring the exponent in.  Remember that every term (including the 2) needs to get the exponent.



Recall that  so you can’t go any further with this.



Show Solution

Don’t make this one harder than it has to be.  Note that the whole thing is raised to the zero power so there is only one property that needs to be used here.




Algebra (Introduction) Previous Section   Next Section Absolute Value
  Next Chapter Trigonometry

Algebra Trig Review / Algebra / Exponents   

© 2003 - 2018 Paul Dawkins