You can navigate through this E-Book using the menu to the left. For E-Books that have a Chapter/Section organization each option in the menu to the left indicates a chapter and will open a menu showing the sections in that chapter. Alternatively, you can navigate to the next/previous section or chapter by clicking the links in the boxes at the very top and bottom of the material.
Also, depending upon the E-Book, it will be possible to download the complete E-Book, the chapter containing the current section and/or the current section. You can do this be clicking on the E-Book, Chapter, and/or the Section link provided below.
For those pages with mathematics on them you can, in most cases, enlarge the mathematics portion by clicking on the equation. Click the enlarged version to hide it.
In the previous section we
looked at a couple of problems and in both problems we had a function (slope in
the tangent problem case and average rate of change in the rate of change
problem) and we wanted to know how that function was behaving at some point 
. At this stage of the game we no longer care
where the functions came from and we no longer care if we’re going to see them
down the road again or not. All that we
need to know or worry about is that we’ve got these functions and we want to
know something about them.
To answer the questions in the last section we choose values
of x that got closer and closer to 
and we plugged these into the function. We also made sure that we looked at values of
x that were on both the left and the
right of 
. Once we did this we looked at our table of
function values and saw what the function values were approaching as x got closer and closer to 
and used this to guess the value that we were
after.
This process is called taking
a limit and we have some notation for this.
The limit notation for the two problems from the last section is,
In this notation we will note that we always give the
function that we’re working with and we also give the value of x (or t) that we are moving in towards.
In this section we are going to take an intuitive approach
to limits and try to get a feel for what they are and what they can tell us
about a function. With that goal in mind
we are not going to get into how we actually compute limits yet. We will instead rely on what we did in the
previous section as well as another approach to guess the value of the limits.
Both of the approaches that we are going to use in this section
are designed to help us understand just what limits are. In general we don’t typically use the methods
in this section to compute limits and in many cases can be very difficult to
use to even estimate the value of a limit and/or will give the wrong value on
occasion. We will look at actually
computing limits in a couple of sections.
Let’s first start off with the following “definition” of a
limit.
Definition
|
We say that the limit of f(x) is L as x approaches a and write this as

provided we can make f(x)
as close to L as we want for all x sufficiently close to a, from both sides, without actually
letting x be a.
|
This is not the exact, precise definition of a limit. If you would like to see the more precise and
mathematical definition of a limit you should check out the The Definition of a Limit section at the end of this
chapter. The definition given above is
more of a “working” definition. This
definition helps us to get an idea of just what limits are and what they can
tell us about functions.
So just what does this definition mean? Well let’s suppose that we know that the
limit does in fact exist. According to
our “working” definition we can then decide how close to L that we’d like to make f(x). For sake of argument let’s suppose that we
want to make f(x) no more that 0.001
away from L. This means that we want one of the following
Now according to the “working” definition this means that if
we get x sufficiently close to we can
make one of the above true. However, it
actually says a little more. It actually
says that somewhere out there in the world is a value of x, say X, so that for all
x’s that are closer to a than X then one of the above statements will be true.
This is actually a fairly important idea. There are many functions out there in the
work that we can make as close to L
for specific values of x that are
close to a, but there will other
values of x closer to a that give functions values that are
nowhere near close to L. In order for a limit to exist once we get f(x) as close to L as we want for some x
then it will need to stay in that close to L
(or get closer) for all values of x
that are closer to a. We’ll see an example
of this later in this section.
In somewhat simpler terms the definition says that as x gets closer and closer to x=a (from both sides of course…) then f(x) must be getting closer and closer to L. Or, as we move in towards
x=a then f(x) must be moving in
towards L.
It is important to note once again that we must look at
values of x that are on both sides of
x=a.
We should also note that we are not allowed to use x=a in the definition. We
will often use the information that limits give us to get some information
about what is going on right at x=a,
but the limit itself is not concerned with what is actually going on at x=a.
The limit is only concerned with what is going on around the point x=a.
This is an important concept about limits that we need to keep in mind.
An alternative notation that we will occasionally use in
denoting limits is
How do we use this definition to help us estimate
limits? We do exactly what we did in the
previous section. We take x’s
on both sides of x=a that move in
closer and closer to a and we plug
these into our function. We then look to
see if we can determine what number the function values are moving in towards
and use this as our estimate.
Let’s work an example.
|
Example 1 Estimate
the value of the following limit.

Solution
Notice that I did say estimate the value of the
limit. Again, we are not going to
directly compute limits in this section.
The point of this section is to give us a better idea of how limits
work and what they can tell us about the function.
So, with that in mind we are going to work this in pretty
much the same way that we did in the last section. We will choose values of x that get closer and closer to x=2 and plug these values into the
function. Doing this gives the
following table of values.
|
x
|
f(x)
|
x
|
f(x)
|
|
2.5
|
3.4
|
1.5
|
5.0
|
|
2.1
|
3.857142857
|
1.9
|
4.157894737
|
|
2.01
|
3.985074627
|
1.99
|
4.015075377
|
|
2.001
|
3.998500750
|
1.999
|
4.001500750
|
|
2.0001
|
3.999850007
|
1.9999
|
4.000150008
|
|
2.00001
|
3.999985000
|
1.99999
|
4.000015000
|
Note that we made sure and picked
values of x that were on both sides
of  and that we moved in very close to  to make sure that any trends that we might
be seeing are in fact correct.
Also notice that we can’t actually
plug in  into the function as this would give us a
division by zero error. This is not a
problem since the limit doesn’t care what is happening at the point in
question.
From this table it appears that the
function is going to 4 as x
approaches 2, so
 .
|










Let’s think a little bit more about
what’s going on here. Let’s graph the
function from the last example. The
graph of the function in the range of x’s
that were interested in is shown below.
First, notice that there is a rather
large open dot at 
. This is there to remind us that the function
(and hence the graph) doesn’t exist at 
.
As we were plugging in values of x into the function we are in effect
moving along the graph in towards the point as 
. This is shown in the graph by the two arrows
on the graph that are moving in towards the point.

When we are computing limits the
question that we are really asking is what y
value is our graph approaching as we move in towards 
on our graph.
We are NOT asking what y value the graph takes at the point in
question. In other words, we are asking
what the graph is doing around the
point 
. In our case we can see that as x moves in towards 2 (from both sides)
the function is approaching 
even though the function itself doesn’t even
exist at 
. Therefore we can say that the limit is in
fact 4.
So what have we learned about limits? Limits are asking what the function is doing around 
and are not
concerned with what the function is actually doing at 
. This is a good thing as many of the functions
that we’ll be looking at won’t even exist at 
as we saw in our last example.
Let’s work another example to drive this point home.
|
Example 2 Estimate
the value of the following limit.

Solution
The first thing to note here is that this is exactly the
same function as the first example with the exception that we’ve now given it
a value for  . So, let’s first note that

As far as estimating the value of this limit goes, nothing
has changed in comparison to the first example. We could build up a table of values as we
did in the first example or we could take a quick look at the graph of the
function. Either method will give us
the value of the limit.
Lets’ first take a look at a table of values and see what
that tells us. Notice that the
presence of the value for the function at  will not change our choices for x.
We only choose values of x
that are getting closer to  but we never take  . In other words the table of values that we
used in the first example will be exactly the same table that we’ll use
here. So, since we’ve already got it
down once there is no reason to redo it here.
From this table it is again clear that the limit is,

The limit is NOT
6! Remember from the discussion after
the first example that limits do not care what the function is actually doing
at the point in question. Limits are
only concerned with what is going on around
the point. Since the only thing about
the function that we actually changed was its behavior at  this will not change the limit.
Let’s also take a quick look at this functions graph to
see if this says the same thing.

Again, we can see that as we move in towards  on our graph the function is still
approaching a y value of 4. Remember that we are only asking what the
function is doing around  and we don’t care what the function is
actually doing at  . The graph then also supports the conclusion
that the limit is,

|
























Let’s make the point one more time just to make sure we’ve
got it. Limits are not concerned with what is going on at 
.
Limits are only concerned with what is going on around 
. We keep saying this, but it is a very
important concept about limits that we must always keep in mind. So, we will take every opportunity to remind
ourselves of this idea.
Since limits aren’t concerned with what is actually
happening at 
we will, on occasion, see situations like the
previous example where the limit at a point and the function value at a point
are different. This won’t always happen
of course. There are times where the
function value and the limit at a point are the same and we will eventually see
some examples of those. It is important
however, to not get excited about things when the function and the limit do not
take the same value at a point. It
happens sometimes and so we will need to be able to deal with those cases when
they arise.
Let’s take a look another example to try and beat this idea
into the ground.
|
Example 3 Estimate
the value of the following limit.

Solution
First don’t get excited about the θ in function.
It’s just a letter, just like x
is a letter! It’s a Greek letter, but
it’s a letter and you will be asked to deal with Greek letters on occasion so
it’s a good idea to start getting used to them at this point.
Now, also notice that if we plug in θ =0 that we will get division by
zero and so the function doesn’t exist at this point. Actually, we get 0/0 at this point, but
because of the division by zero this function does not exist at θ =0.
So, as we did in the first example let’s get a table of
values and see what if we can guess what value the function is heading in
towards.
|

|

|

|

|
|
1
|
0.45969769
|
-1
|
-0.45969769
|
|
0.1
|
0.04995835
|
-0.1
|
-0.04995835
|
|
0.01
|
0.00499996
|
-0.01
|
-0.00499996
|
|
0.001
|
0.00049999
|
-0.001
|
-0.00049999
|
Okay, it looks like the function is moving in towards a
value of zero as θ moves in towards 0, from both sides of
course.
Therefore, the we will guess that the limit has the value,

|










