Paul's Online Math Notes
[Notes]
Algebra - Notes

Internet Explorer 10 & 11 Users : If you have been using Internet Explorer 10 or 11 to view the site (or did at one point anyway) then you know that the equations were not properly placed on the pages unless you put IE into "Compatibility Mode". I beleive that I have partially figured out a way around that and have implimented the "fix" in the Algebra notes (not the practice/assignment problems yet). It's not perfect as some equations that are "inline" (i.e. equations that are in sentences as opposed to those on lines by themselves) are now shifted upwards or downwards slightly but it is better than it was.

If you wish to test this out please make sure the IE is not in Compatibility Mode and give it a test run in the Algebra notes. If you run into any problems please let me know. If things go well over the next week or two then I'll push the fix the full site. I'll also continue to see if I can get the inline equations to display properly.
 Polynomial Functions Previous Chapter Next Chapter Systems of Equations Exponential Functions Previous Section Next Section Solving Exponential Equations

## Logarithm Functions

In this section we now need to move into logarithm functions.  This can be a tricky function to graph right away.  There is going to be some different notation that you aren’t used to and some of the properties may not be all that intuitive.  Do not get discouraged however.  Once you figure these out you will find that they really aren’t that bad and it usually just takes a little working with them to get them figured out.

Here is the definition of the logarithm function.

 If b is any number such that  and  and  then,                            We usually read this as “log base b of x”.

In this definition  is called the logarithm form and  is called the exponential form

Note that the requirement that  is really a result of the fact that we are also requiring .  If you think about it, it will make sense.  We are raising a positive number to an exponent and so there is no way that the result can possibly be anything other than another positive number.  It is very important to remember that we can’t take the logarithm of zero or a negative number.

Now, let’s address the notation used here as that is usually the biggest hurdle that students need to overcome before starting to understand logarithms.  First, the “log” part of the function is simply three letters that are used to denote the fact that we are dealing with a logarithm.  They are not variables and they aren’t signifying multiplication.  They are just there to tell us we are dealing with a logarithm.

Next, the b that is subscripted on the “log” part is there to tell us what the base is as this is an important piece of information.  Also, despite what it might look like there is no exponentiation in the logarithm form above.  It might look like we’ve got  in that form, but it isn’t.  It just looks like that might be what’s happening.

It is important to keep the notation with logarithms straight, if you don’t you will find it very difficult to understand them and to work with them.

Now, let’s take a quick look at how we evaluate logarithms.

 Example 1  Evaluate each of the following logarithms. (a)     [Solution] (b)     [Solution] (c)     [Solution] (d)     [Solution] (e)     [Solution] (f)     [Solution] Solution Now, the reality is that evaluating logarithms directly can be a very difficult process, even for those who really understand them.  It is usually much easier to first convert the logarithm form into exponential form.  In that form we can usually get the answer pretty quickly.   (a)   Okay what we are really asking here is the following.                                                                   As suggested above, let’s convert this to exponential form.                                         Most people cannot evaluate the logarithm  right off the top of their head.  However, most people can determine the exponent that we need on 4 to get 16 once we do the exponentiation.  So, since,   we must have the following value of the logarithm.                                                                     (b)   This one is similar to the previous part.  Let’s first convert to exponential form.                                         If you don’t know this answer right off the top of your head, start trying numbers.  In other words, compute , , , etc until you get 16.  In this case we need an exponent of 4.  Therefore, the value of this logarithm is,                                                                     Before moving on to the next part notice that the base on these is a very important piece of notation.  Changing the base will change the answer and so we always need to keep track of the base.   (c)   We’ll do this one without any real explanation to see how well you’ve got the evaluation of logarithms down.                                (d)   Now, this one looks different from the previous parts, but it really isn’t any different.  As always let’s first convert to exponential form.                                        First, notice that the only way that we can raise an integer to an integer power and get a fraction as an answer is for the exponent to be negative.  So, we know that the exponent has to be negative.   Now, let’s ignore the fraction for a second and ask .  In this case if we cube 5 we will get 125.    So, it looks like we have the following,                                    (e)   Converting this logarithm to exponential form gives,                                     Now, just like the previous part, the only way that this is going to work out is if the exponent is negative.  Then all we need to do is recognize that  and we can see that,                             (f)   Here is the answer to this one.

Hopefully, you now have an idea on how to evaluate logarithms and are starting to get a grasp on the notation.  There are a few more evaluations that we want to do however, we need to introduce some special logarithms that occur on a very regular basis.  They are the common logarithm and the natural logarithm.  Here are the definitions and notations that we will be using for these two logarithms.

So, the common logarithm is simply the log base 10, except we drop the “base 10” part of the notation.  Similarly, the natural logarithm is simply the log base e with a different notation and where e is the same number that we saw in the previous section and is defined to be .

Let’s take a look at a couple more evaluations.

 Example 2  Evaluate each of the following logarithms. (a)   (b)   (c)   (d)   (e)   (f)   Solution To do the first four evaluations we just need to remember what the notation for these are and what base is implied by the notation.  The final two evaluations are to illustrate some of the properties of all logarithms that we’ll be looking at eventually.   (a)  because .   (b)  because .   (c)  because .   (d)  because .  Notice that with this one we are really just acknowledging a change of notation from fractional exponent into radical form.   (e)  because .  Notice that this one will work regardless of the base that we’re using.   (f)  because .  Again, note that the base that we’re using here won’t change the answer.

So, when evaluating logarithms all that we’re really asking is what exponent did we put onto the base to get the number in the logarithm.

Now, before we get into some of the properties of logarithms let’s first do a couple of quick graphs.

Example 3  Sketch the graph of the common logarithm and the natural logarithm on the same axis system.

Solution

This example has two points.  First, it will familiarize us with the graphs of the two logarithms that we are most likely to see in other classes.  Also, it will give us some practice using our calculator to evaluate these logarithms because the reality is that is how we will need to do most of these evaluations.

Here is a table of values for the two logarithms.

 x -0.3010 -0.6931 1 0 0 2 0.3010 0.6931 3 0.4771 1.0986 4 0.6021 1.3863

Here is a sketch of the graphs of these two functions.

Now let’s start looking at some properties of logarithms.  We’ll start off with some basic evaluation properties.

Properties of Logarithms

 .  This follows from the fact that . .  This follows from the fact that . .  This can be generalized out to . .  This can be generalized out to .

Properties 3 and 4 leads to a nice relationship between the logarithm and exponential function.  Let’s first compute the following function compositions for  and .

Recall from the section on inverse functions that this means that the exponential and logarithm functions are inverses of each other.  This is a nice fact to remember on occasion.

We should also give the generalized version of  Properties 3 and 4 in terms of both the natural and common logarithm as we’ll be seeing those in the next couple of sections on occasion.

Now, let’s take a look at some manipulation properties of the logarithm.

More Properties of Logarithms

 For these properties we will assume that  and . If  then .

We won’t be doing anything with the final property in this section; it is here only for the sake of completeness.  We will be looking at this property in detail in a couple of sections.

The first two properties listed here can be a little confusing at first since on one side we’ve got a product or a quotient inside the logarithm and on the other side we’ve got a sum or difference of two logarithms.  We will just need to be careful with these properties and make sure to use them correctly.

Also, note that there are no rules on how to break up the logarithm of the sum or difference of two terms.  To be clear about this let’s note the following,

Be careful with these and do not try to use these as they simply aren’t true.

Note that all of the properties given to this point are valid for both the common and natural logarithms.  We just didn’t write them out explicitly using the notation for these two logarithms, the properties do hold for them nonetheless

Now, let’s see some examples of how to use these properties.

 Example 4  Simplify each of the following logarithms. (a)     [Solution] (b)     [Solution] (c)     [Solution] (d)     [Solution] Solution The instructions here may be a little misleading.  When we say simplify we really mean to say that we want to use as many of the logarithm properties as we can.   (a)   Note that we can’t use Property 7 to bring the 3 and the 5 down into the front of the logarithm at this point.  In order to use Property 7 the whole term in the logarithm needs to be raised to the power.  In this case the two exponents are only on individual terms in the logarithm and so Property 7 can’t be used here.   We do, however, have a product inside the logarithm so we can use Property 5 on this logarithm.                                                  Now that we’ve done this we can use Property 7 on each of these individual logarithms to get the final simplified answer.                                                     (b)   In this case we’ve got a product and a quotient in the logarithm.  In these cases it is almost always best to deal with the quotient before dealing with the product.  Here is the first step in this part.                                                    Now, we’ll break up the product in the first term and once we’ve done that we’ll take care of the exponents on the terms.                                                (c)   For this part let’s first rewrite the logarithm a little so that we can see the first step.                                                              Written in this form we can see that there is a single exponent on the whole term and so we’ll take care of that first.                                                             Now, we will take care of the product.                                                         Notice the parenthesis in this the answer.  The  multiplies the original logarithm and so it will also need to multiply the whole “simplified” logarithm.  Therefore, we need to have a set of parenthesis there to make sure that this is taken care of correctly.   (d)   We’ll first take care of the quotient in this logarithm.                                      We now reach the real point to this problem.  The second logarithm is as simplified as we can make it.  Remember that we can’t break up a log of a sum or difference and so this can’t be broken up any farther.  Also, we can only deal with exponents if the term as a whole is raised to the exponent.  The fact that both pieces of this term are squared doesn’t matter.  It needs to be the whole term squared, as in the first logarithm.   So, we can further simplify the first logarithm, but the second logarithm can’t be simplified any more.  Here is the final answer for this problem.

Now, we need to work some examples that go the other way.  This next set of examples is probably more important than the previous set.  We will be doing this kind of logarithm work in a couple of sections.

 Example 5  Write each of the following as a single logarithm with a coefficient of 1. (a)     [Solution] (b)     [Solution] (c)     [Solution] Solution The instruction requiring a coefficient of 1 means that the when we get down to a final logarithm there shouldn’t be any number in front of the logarithm.   Note as well that these examples are going to be using Properties 5  7 only we’ll be using them in reverse.  We will have expressions that look like the right side of the property and use the property to write it so it looks like the left side of the property.   (a) The first step here is to get rid of the coefficients on the logarithms.  This will use Property 7 in reverse.  In this direction, Property 7 says that we can move the coefficient of a logarithm up to become a power on the term inside the logarithm.   Here is that step for this part.                                               We’ve now got a sum of two logarithms both with coefficients of 1 and both with the same base.  This means that we can use Property 5 in reverse.  Here is the answer for this part.     (b) Again, we will first take care of the coefficients on the logarithms.                                                    We now have a difference of two logarithms and so we can use Property 6 in reverse.  When using Property 6 in reverse remember that the term from the logarithm that is subtracted off goes in the denominator of the quotient.  Here is the answer to this part.                                                        (c) In this case we’ve got three terms to deal with and none of the properties have three terms in them.  That isn’t a problem.  Let’s first take care of the coefficients and at the same time we’ll factor a minus sign out of the last two terms.  The reason for this will be apparent in the next step.                                  Now, notice that the quantity in the parenthesis is a sum of two logarithms and so can be combined into a single logarithm with a product as follows,                                      Now we are down to two logarithms and they are a difference of logarithms and so we can write it as a single logarithm with a quotient.

The final topic that we need to discuss in this section is the change of base formula.

Most calculators these days are capable of evaluating common logarithms and natural logarithms.  However, that is about it, so what do we do if we need to evaluate another logarithm that can’t be done easily as we did in the first set of examples that we looked at?

To do this we have the change of base formula.  Here is the change of base formula.

where we can choose b to be anything we want it to be.  In order to use this to help us evaluate logarithms this is usually the common or natural logarithm.  Here is the change of base formula using both the common logarithm and the natural logarithm.

Let’s see how this works with an example.

 Example 6  Evaluate . Solution First, notice that we can’t use the same method to do this evaluation that we did in the first set of examples.  This would require us to look at the following exponential form,                                                                      and that’s just not something that anyone can answer off the top of their head.  If the 7 had been a 5, or a 25, or a 125, etc. we could do this, but it’s not.  Therefore, we have to use the change of base formula.   Now, we can use either one and we’ll get the same answer.  So, let’s use both and verify that.  We’ll start with the common logarithm form of the change of base.                                    Now, let’s try the natural logarithm form of the change of base formula.                                      So, we got the same answer despite the fact that the fractions involved different answers.
 Exponential Functions Previous Section Next Section Solving Exponential Equations Polynomial Functions Previous Chapter Next Chapter Systems of Equations

[Notes]

 © 2003 - 2016 Paul Dawkins