Paul's Online Math Notes
     
 
Online Notes / Differential Equations (Notes) / Second Order DE`s / Fundamental Sets of Solutions
Notice
I've been notified that Lamar University will be doing some network maintenance on April 17 during the hours of 8:00 PM through 2:00 AM Central Daylight Time and on April 26 during the hours of 7:00 AM through 5:00 PM Central Daylight Time. During these times the website will be unavailable during some or all of those times. I apologize for the inconvenience!

Paul.



Internet Explorer 10 & 11 Users : If you are using Internet Explorer 10 or Internet Explorer 11 then, in all likelihood, the equations on the pages are all shifted downward. To fix this you need to put your browser in Compatibility View for my site. Click here for instructions on how to do that. Alternatively, you can also view the pages in Chrome or Firefox as they should display properly in the latest versions of those browsers without any additional steps on your part.

Reduction of Order Differential Equations - Notes More on the Wronskian

 Fundamental Sets of Solutions

The time has finally come to define “nice enough”.  We’ve been using this term throughout the last few sections to describe those solutions that could be used to form a general solution and it is now time to officially define it.

 

First, because everything that we’re going to be doing here only requires linear and homogeneous we won’t require constant coefficients in our differential equation.  So, let’s start with the following IVP.

(1)

 

Let’s also suppose that we have already found two solutions to this differential equation, y1(t) and y2(t).  We know from the Principle of Superposition that

 

(2)

 

will also be a solution to the differential equation.  What we want to know is whether or not it will be a general solution.  In order for (2) to be considered a general solution it must satisfy the general initial conditions in (1).

 

 

 

 

This will also imply that any solution to the differential equation can be written in this form.

 

So, let’s see if we can find constants that will satisfy these conditions.  First differentiate (2) and plug in the initial conditions.

 

(3)

 

Since we are assuming that we’ve already got the two solutions everything in this system is technically known and so this is a system that can be solved for c1 and c2.  This can be done in general using Cramer’s Rule.  Using Cramer’s Rule gives the following solution.

 

(4)

where,

 

 

is the determinant of a 2x2 matrix.  If you don’t know about determinants that is okay, just use the formula that we’ve provided above.

 

Now, (4) will give the solution to the system (3).  Note that in practice we generally don’t use Cramer’s Rule to solve systems, we just proceed in a straightforward manner and solve the system using basic algebra techniques.  So, why did we use Cramer’s Rule here then?

 

We used Cramer’s Rule because we can use (4) to develop a condition that will allow us to determine when we can solve for the constants.  All three (yes three, the denominators are the same!) of the quantities in (4) are just numbers and the only thing that will prevent us from actually getting a solution will be when the denominator is zero.

 

The quantity in the denominator is called the Wronskian and is denoted as

 

 

 

 

When it is clear what the functions and/or t are we often just denote the Wronskian by W.

 

Let’s recall what we were after for here.  We wanted to determine when two solutions to (1) would be nice enough to form a general solution.  The two solutions will form a general solution to (1) if they satisfy the general initial conditions given in (1) and we can see from Cramer’s Rule that they will satisfy the initial conditions provided the Wronskian isn’t zero.  Or,

 

 

 

 

 

So, suppose that y1(t) and y2(t) are two solutions to (1) and that .  Then the two solutions are called a fundamental set of solutions and the general solution to (1) is

 

 

 

We know now what “nice enough” means.  Two solutions are “nice enough” if they are a fundamental set of solutions.

 

So, let’s check one of the claims that we made in a previous section.  We’ll leave the other two to you to check if you’d like to.

 

Example 1  Back in the complex root section we made the claim that

                                

were a fundamental set of solutions.  Prove that they in fact are.

 

Solution

So, to prove this we will need to take find the Wronskian for these two solutions and show that it isn’t zero.

              

 

Now, the exponential will never be zero and  (if it were we wouldn’t have complex roots!) and so .  Therefore, these two solutions are in fact a fundamental set of solutions and so the general solution in this case is.

                                             

 

Example 2  In the first example that we worked in the Reduction of Order section we found a second solution to

                                                          

 

Show that this second solution, along with the given solution, form a fundamental set of solutions for the differential equation.

 

Solution

The two solutions from that example are

                                               

 

Let’s compute the Wronskian of these two solutions.

                                    

 

So, the Wronskian will never be zero.  Note that we can’t plug t = 0 into the Wronskian.  This would be a problem in finding the constants in the general solution, except that we also can’t plug t = 0 into the solution either and so this isn’t the problem that it might appear to be.

 

So, since the Wronskian isn’t zero for any t the two solutions form a fundamental set of solutions and the general solution is

                                                            

as we claimed in that example.

 

To this point we’ve found a set of solutions then we’ve claimed that they are in fact a fundamental set of solutions.  Of course, you can now verify all those claims that we’ve made, however this does bring up a question.  How do we know that for a given differential equation a set of fundamental solutions will exist?  The following theorem answers this question.

 

Theorem

Consider the differential equation

                                                      

where p(t) and q(t) are continuous functions on some interval I.  Choose t0 to be any point in the interval I.  Let y1(t) be a solution to the differential equation that satisfies the initial conditions.

                                                     

 

Let y2(t) be a solution to the differential equation that satisfies the initial conditions.

                                                      

 

Then y1(t) and y2(t) form a fundamental set of solutions for the differential equation.

 

It is easy enough to show that these two solutions form a fundamental set of solutions.  Just compute the Wronskian.

 

 

 

So, fundamental sets of solutions will exist provided we can solve the two IVP’s given in the theorem.

 

Example 3  Use the theorem to find a fundamental set of solutions for

                                                            

using t0 = 0.

 

Solution

Using the techniques from the first part of this chapter we can find the two solutions that we’ve been using to this point.

                                               

 

These do form a fundamental set of solutions as we can easily verify.  However, they are NOT the set that will be given by the theorem.  Neither of these solutions will satisfy either of the two sets of initial conditions given in the theorem.  We will have to use these to find the fundamental set of solutions that is given by the theorem.

 

We know that the following is also solution to the differential equation.

                                                          

 

So, let’s apply the first set of initial conditions and see if we can find constants that will work.

                                                      

 

We’ll leave it to you to verify that we get the following solution upon doing this.

                                                        

 

Likewise, if we apply the second set of initial conditions,

                                                      

we will get

                                                        

 

According to the theorem these should form a fundament set of solutions.  This is easy enough to check.

                 

 

So, we got a completely different set of fundamental solutions from the theorem than what we’ve been using up to this point.  This is not a problem.  There are an infinite number of pairs of functions that we could use as a fundamental set of solutions for this problem.

 

So, which set of fundamental solutions should we use?  Well, if we use the ones that we originally found, the general solution would be,

 

 

 

Whereas, if we used the set from the theorem the general solution would be,

 

 

 

This would not be very fun to work with when it came to determining the coefficients to satisfy a general set of initial conditions.

 

So, which set of fundamental solutions should we use?  We should always try to use the set that is the most convenient to use for a given problem.

Reduction of Order Differential Equations - Notes More on the Wronskian

Online Notes / Differential Equations (Notes) / Second Order DE`s / Fundamental Sets of Solutions

[Contact Me] [Links] [Privacy Statement] [Site Map] [Terms of Use] [Menus by Milonic]

© 2003 - 2014 Paul Dawkins