To this point we’ve done quite a few derivatives, but they
have all been derivatives of functions of the form 
. Unfortunately not all the functions that
we’re going to look at will fall into this form.
Let’s take a look at an example of a function like this.
|
Example 1 Find
for .
Solution
There are actually two solution methods for this problem.
Solution 1 :
This is the simple way of doing the problem. Just solve for y to get the function in the form that we’re used to dealing with
and then differentiate.
So, that’s easy enough to do. However, there are some functions for which
this can’t be done. That’s where the
second solution technique comes into play.
Solution 2 :
In this case we’re going to leave the function in the form
that we were given and work with it in that form. However, let’s recall from the first part
of this solution that if we could solve for y then we will get y as
a function of x. In other words, if we could solve for y (as we could in this case, but won’t
always be able to do) we get . Let’s rewrite the equation to note this.
Be careful here and note that when we write we don’t mean y times x. What we are noting here is that y is some (probably unknown) function
of x. This is important to recall when doing this
solution technique.
The next step in this solution is to differentiate both
sides with respect to x as follows,
The right side is easy.
It’s just the derivative of a constant. The left side is also easy, but we’ve got
to recognize that we’ve actually got a product here, the x and the . So to do the derivative of the left side
we’ll need to do the product rule.
Doing this gives,
Now, recall that we have the following notational way of
writing the derivative.
Using this we get the following,
Note that we dropped the on the y
as it was only there to remind us that the y was a function of x
and now that we’ve taken the derivative it’s no longer really needed. We just wanted it in the equation to
recognize the product rule when we took the derivative.
So, let’s now recall just what were we after. We were after the derivative, ,
and notice that there is now a in the equation. So, to get the derivative all that we need
to do is solve the equation for .
There it is. Using
the second solution technique this is our answer. This is not what we got from the first
solution however. Or at least it
doesn’t look like the same derivative that we got from the first
solution. Recall however, that we
really do know what y is in terms
of x and if we plug that in we will
get,
which is what we got from the first solution. Regardless of the solution technique used
we should get the same derivative.
|
The process that we used in the second solution to the
previous example is called implicit
differentiation and that is the subject of this section. In the previous example we were able to just
solve for y and avoid implicit
differentiation. However, in the
remainder of the examples in this section we either won’t be able to solve for y or, as we’ll see in one of the
examples below, the answer will not be in a form that we can deal with.
In the second solution above we replaced the y with and then did the derivative. Recall that we did this to remind us that y is in fact a function of x.
We’ll be doing this quite a bit in these problems, although we rarely
actually write . So, before we actually work anymore implicit
differentiation problems let’s do a quick set of “simple” derivatives that will
hopefully help us with doing derivatives of functions that also contain a .
|
Example 2 Differentiate
each of the following.
(a) , , [Solution]
(b) , [Solution]
(c) , [Solution]
Solution
These are written a little differently from what we’re
used to seeing here. This is because
we want to match up these problems with what we’ll be doing in this
section. Also, each of these parts has
several functions to differentiate starting with a specific function followed
by a general function. This again, is
to help us with some specific parts of the implicit differentiation process
that we’ll be doing.
(a) , ,
With the first function here we’re being asked to do the
following,
and this is just
the chain rule. We differentiated the
outside function (the exponent of 5) and then multiplied that by the
derivative of the inside function (the stuff inside the parenthesis).
For the second
function we’re going to do basically the same thing. We’re going to need to use the chain
rule. The outside function is still
the exponent of 5 while the inside function this time is simply . We don’t have a specific function here, but
that doesn’t mean that we can’t at least write down the chain rule for this
function. Here is the derivative for
this function,
We don’t
actually know what is so when we do the derivative of the
inside function all we can do is write down notation for the derivative, i.e. .
With the final
function here we simply replaced the f in the second function with a y since most of our work in this
section will involve y’s instead of
f’s. Outside of that this function is identical
to the second. So, the derivative is,
[Return to Problems]
(b) ,
The first function to differentiate here is just a quick
chain rule problem again so here is it’s derivative,
For the second
function we didn’t bother this time with using and just jumped straight to for the general version. This is still just a general version of
what we did for the first function.
The outside function is still the sine and the inside is given by and while we don’t have a formula for and so we can’t actually take its derivative
we do have a notation for its derivative.
Here is the derivative for this function,
[Return to Problems]
(c) ,
In this part we’ll just give the answers for each and
leave out the explanation that we had in the first two parts.
[Return to Problems]
|
So, in this set of examples we were just doing some chain
rule problems where the inside function was instead of a specific function. This kind of derivative shows up all the time
in doing implicit differentiation so we need to make sure that we can do
them. Also note that we only did this
for three kinds of functions but there are many more kinds of functions that we
could have used here.
So, it’s now time to do our first problem where implicit
differentiation is required, unlike the first example where we could actually
avoid implicit differentiation by solving for y.
|
Example 3 Find
for the following function.
Solution
Now, this is just a circle and we can solve for y which would give,
Prior to starting this problem we stated that we had to do
implicit differentiation here because we couldn’t just solve for y and yet that’s what we just
did. So, why can’t we use "normal"
differentiation here? The problem is
the “ ”.
With this in the “solution” for y
we see that y is in fact two
different functions. Which should we
use? Should we use both? We only want a single function for the
derivative and at best we have two functions here.
So, in this example we really are going to need to do
implicit differentiation so we can avoid this. In this example we’ll do the same thing we
did in the first example and remind ourselves that y is really a function of x
and write y as . Once we’ve done this all we need to do is
differentiate each term with respect to x.
As with the first example the right side is easy. The left side is also pretty easy since all
we need to do is take the derivative of each term and note that the second
term will be similar the part (a) of the second example. All we need to do for the second term is
use the chain rule.
After taking the derivative we have,
At this point we can drop the part as it was only in the problem to help
with the differentiation process. The
final step is to simply solve the resulting equation for .
Unlike the first example we can’t just plug in for y since we wouldn’t know which of the
two functions to use. Most answers
from implicit differentiation will involve both x and y so don’t get
excited about that when it happens.
|
As always, we can’t forget our interpretations of
derivatives.
|
Example 4 Find
the equation of the tangent line to
at the point .
Solution
First note that unlike all the other tangent line problems
we’ve done in previous sections we need to be given both the x and the y values of the point.
Notice as well that this point does lie on the graph of the circle
(you can check by plugging the points into the equation) and so it’s okay to
talk about the tangent line at this point.
Recall that to write down the tangent line we need is the slope of the tangent line and this is nothing more than the derivative
evaluated at the given point. We’ve
got the derivative from the previous example so as we need to do is plug in
the given point.
The tangent line is then.
|
Now, let’s work some more examples. In the remaining examples we will no longer
write for y. This is just something that we were doing to
remind ourselves that y is really a
function of x to help with the
derivatives. Seeing the reminded us that we needed to do the chain
rule on that portion of the problem.
From this point on we’ll leave the y’s
written as y’s and in our head we’ll
need to remember that they really are and that we’ll need to do the chain rule.
There is an easy way to remember how to do the chain rule in
these problems. The chain rule really
tells us to differentiate the function as we usually would, except we need to
add on a derivative of the inside function.
In implicit differentiation this means that every time we are
differentiating a term with y in it
the inside function is the y and we
will need to add a onto the term since that will be the
derivative of the inside function.
Let’s see a couple of examples.
|
Example 5 Find
for each of the following.
(a) [Solution]
(b) [Solution]
(c) [Solution]
Solution
(a)
First differentiate both sides with respect to x and remember that each y is really we just aren’t going to write it that way
anymore. This means that the first
term on the left will be a product rule.
We differentiated these kinds of functions involving y’s to a power with the chain rule in
the Example 2 above. Also, recall the discussion prior to the
start of this problem. When doing this
kind of chain rule problem all that we need to do is differentiate the y’s as normal and then add on a ,
which is nothing more than the derivative of the “inside function”.
Here is the differentiation of each side for this
function.
Now all that we need to do is solve for the derivative, . This is just basic solving algebra that you
are capable of doing. The main problem
is that it’s liable to be messier than what you’re used to doing. All we need to do is get all the terms with
in them on one side and all the terms
without in them on the other. Then factor out of all the terms containing it and
divide both sides by the “coefficient” of the . Here is the solving work for this one,
The algebra in these problems can be quite messy so be
careful with that.
[Return to Problems]
(b)
We’ve got two product rules to deal with this time. Here is the derivative of this function.
Notice the derivative tacked onto the secant! Again, this is just a chain rule problem
similar to the second part of Example 2 above.
Now, solve for the derivative.
[Return to Problems]
(c)
We’re going to need to be careful with this problem. We’ve got a couple chain rules that we’re
going to need to deal with here that are a little different from those that
we’ve dealt with prior to this problem.
In both the exponential and the logarithm we’ve got a
“standard” chain rule in that there is something other than just an x or y inside the exponential and logarithm. So, this means we’ll do the chain rule as
usual here and then when we do the derivative of the inside function for each
term we’ll have to deal with differentiating y’s.
Here is the derivative of this equation.
In both of the chain rules note that the didn’t get tacked on until we actually
differentiated the y’s in that
term.
Now we need to solve for the derivative and this is liable
to be somewhat messy. In order to get
the on one side we’ll need to multiply the
exponential through the parenthesis and break up the quotient.
Note that to make the derivative at least look a little
nicer we converted all the fractions to negative exponents.
[Return to Problems]
|
Okay, we’ve seen one application of implicit differentiation
in the tangent line example above.
However, there is another application that we will be seeing in every
problem in the next section.
In some cases we will have two (or more) functions all of
which are functions of a third variable.
So, we might have and ,
for example and in these cases we will be differentiating with respect to t.
This is just implicit differentiation like we did in the previous
examples, but there is a difference however.
In the previous examples we have functions involving x’s and y’s and thinking of y as . In these problems we differentiated with
respect to x and so when faced with x’s in the function we differentiated as
normal and when faced with y’s we
differentiated as normal except we then added a onto that term because we were really doing a
chain rule.
In the new example we want to look at we’re assuming that and that and differentiating with respect to t.
This means that every time we are faced with an x or a y we’ll be doing
the chain rule. This in turn means that
when we differentiate an x we will
need to add on an and whenever we differentiate a y we will add on a .
These new types of problems are really the same kind of
problem we’ve been doing in this section.
They are just expanded out a little to include more than one function
that will require a chain rule.
Let’s take a look at an example of this kind of problem.
|
Example 6 Assume
that and and differentiate the following equation
with respect to t.
Solution
So, just differentiate as normal and add on an appropriate
derivative at each step. Note as well
that the first term will be a product rule since both x and y are functions
of t.
There really isn’t all that much to this problem. Since there are two derivatives in the
problem we won’t be bothering to solve for one of them. When we do this kind of problem in the next
section the problem will imply which one we need to solve for.
|
At this point there doesn’t seem be any real reason for
doing this kind of problem, but as we’ll see in the next section every problem
that we’ll be doing there will involve this kind of implicit differentiation.