Paul's Online Math Notes
     
 
Online Notes / Calculus II (Notes) / Series & Sequences / Sequences

Internet Explorer 10 & 11 Users : If you are using Internet Explorer 10 or Internet Explorer 11 then, in all likelihood, the equations on the pages are all shifted downward. To fix this you need to put your browser in Compatibility View for my site. Click here for instructions on how to do that. Alternatively, you can also view the pages in Chrome or Firefox as they should display properly in the latest versions of those browsers without any additional steps on your part.

Let’s start off this section with a discussion of just what a sequence is.  A sequence is nothing more than a list of numbers written in a specific order.  The list may or may not have an infinite number of terms in them although we will be dealing exclusively with infinite sequences in this class.  General sequence terms are denoted as follows,

 

 

 

 

Because we will be dealing with infinite sequences each term in the sequence will be followed by another term as noted above.  In the notation above we need to be very careful with the subscripts.  The subscript of  denotes the next term in the sequence and NOT one plus the nth term!  In other words,

 

 

so be very careful when writing subscripts to make sure that the “+1” doesn’t migrate out of the subscript!  This is an easy mistake to make when you first start dealing with this kind of thing.

 

There is a variety of ways of denoting a sequence.  Each of the following are equivalent ways of denoting a sequence.

 

 

 

 

In the second and third notations above an is usually given by a formula. 

 

A couple of notes are now in order about these notations.  First, note the difference between the second and third notations above.  If the starting point is not important or is implied in some way by the problem it is often not written down as we did in the third notation.  Next, we used a starting point of  in the third notation only so we could write one down.  There is absolutely no reason to believe that a sequence will start at .  A sequence will start where ever it needs to start.

 

Let’s take a look at a couple of sequences.

 

Example 1  Write down the first few terms of each of the following sequences.

(a)    [Solution]

(b)    [Solution]

(c) , where    [Solution]

 

Solution

(a)  

To get the first few sequence terms here all we need to do is plug in values of n into the formula given and we’ll get the sequence terms.

                                           

 

Note the inclusion of the “…” at the end!  This is an important piece of notation as it is the only thing that tells us that the sequence continues on and doesn’t terminate at the last term.

[Return to Problems]

(b)  

This one is similar to the first one.  The main difference is that this sequence doesn’t start at .

                                          

Note that the terms in this sequence alternate in signs.  Sequences of this kind are sometimes called alternating sequences.

[Return to Problems]

 

(c) , where  

 

This sequence is different from the first two in the sense that it doesn’t have a specific formula for each term.  However, it does tell us what each term should be.  Each term should be the nth digit of π.  So we know that  

 

The sequence is then,

 

[Return to Problems]

 

In the first two parts of the previous example note that we were really treating the formulas as functions that can only have integers plugged into them.  Or,

 

 

 

This is an important idea in the study of sequences (and series).  Treating the sequence terms as function evaluations will allow us to do many things with sequences that couldn’t do otherwise.  Before delving further into this idea however we need to get a couple more ideas out of the way.

 

First we want to think about “graphing” a sequence.  To graph the sequence  we plot the points  as n ranges over all possible values on a graph.  For instance, let’s graph the sequence .  The first few points on the graph are,

 

 

 

The graph, for the first 30 terms of the sequence, is then,

 

Sequences_G1

 

This graph leads us to an important idea about sequences.  Notice that as n increases the sequence terms in our sequence, in this case, get closer and closer to zero.  We then say that zero is the limit (or sometimes the limiting value) of the sequence and write,

 

 

 

This notation should look familiar to you.  It is the same notation we used when we talked about the limit of a function.  In fact, if you recall, we said earlier that we could think of sequences as functions in some way and so this notation shouldn’t be too surprising.

 

Using the ideas that we developed for limits of functions we can write down the following working definition for limits of sequences.

 

Working Definition of Limit

  1. We say that

                                                                 

if we can make an as close to L as we want for all sufficiently large n.  In other words, the value of the an’s approach L as n approaches infinity.

  1. We say that

                                                                 

if we can make an as large as we want for all sufficiently large n.  Again, in other words, the value of the an’s get larger and larger without bound as n approaches infinity.

  1. We say that

                                                                

if we can make an as large and negative as we want for all sufficiently large n.  Again, in other words, the value of the an’s are negative and get larger and larger without bound as n approaches infinity.

 

The working definitions of the various sequence limits are nice in that they help us to visualize what the limit actually is.  Just like with limits of functions however, there is also a precise definition for each of these limits.  Let’s give those before proceeding

 

Precise Definition of Limit

  1. We say that  if for every number  there is an integer N such that

                    

 

  1. We say that  if  for every number  there is an integer N such that

                              

  1. We say that  if for every number  there is an integer N such that

             

 

We won’t be using the precise definition often, but it will show up occasionally.

 

Note that both definitions tell us that in order for a limit to exist and have a finite value all the sequence terms must be getting closer and closer to that finite value as n increases.

 

Now that we have the definitions of the limit of sequences out of the way we have a bit of terminology that we need to look at.  If  exists and is finite we say that the sequence is convergent.  If  doesn’t exist or is infinite we say the sequence diverges.  Note that sometimes we will say the sequence diverges to  if  and if  we will sometimes say that the sequence diverges to .

 

Get used to the terms “convergent” and “divergent” as we’ll be seeing them quite a bit throughout this chapter.

 

So just how do we find the limits of sequences?  Most limits of most sequences can be found using one of the following theorems.

 

Theorem 1

Given the sequence  if we have a function  such that  and  then  

 

This theorem is basically telling us that we take the limits of sequences much like we take the limit of functions.  In fact, in most cases we’ll not even really use this theorem by explicitly writing down a function.  We will more often just treat the limit as if it were a limit of a function and take the limit as we always did back in Calculus I when we were taking the limits of functions.

 

So, now that we know that taking the limit of a sequence is nearly identical to taking the limit of a function we also know that all the properties from the limits of functions will also hold.

 

Properties









  1.  provided  

 

These properties can be proved using Theorem 1 above and the function limit properties we saw in Calculus I or we can prove them directly using the precise definition of a limit using nearly identical proofs of the function limit properties.

 

Next, just as we had a Squeeze Theorem for function limits we also have one for sequences and it is pretty much identical to the function limit version.

 

Squeeze Theorem for Sequences

If  for all  for some N and  then .

 

Note that in this theorem the “for all  for some N” is really just telling us that  we need to have  for all sufficiently large n, but if it isn’t true for the first few n that won’t invalidate the theorem.

 

As we’ll see not all sequences can be written as functions that we can actually take the limit of.  This will be especially true for sequences that alternate in signs.  While we can always write these sequence terms as a function we simply don’t know how to take the limit of a function like that.  The following theorem will help with some of these sequences.

 

Theorem 2

If  then .

 

Note that in order for this theorem to hold the limit MUST be zero and it won’t work for a sequence whose limit is not zero.  This theorem is easy enough to prove so let’s do that.

 

Proof of Theorem 2

The main thing to this proof is to note that,

                                                             

 

Then note that,

                                                     

 

We then have  and so by the Squeeze Theorem we must also have,

                                                                 

Pf_Box

 

 

The next theorem is a useful theorem giving the convergence/divergence and value (for when it’s convergent) of a sequence that arises on occasion.

 

Theorem 3

The sequence  converges if  and diverges for all other value of r.  Also,

                                                     

 

Here is a quick (well not so quick, but definitely simple) partial proof of this theorem.

 

Partial Proof of Theorem 3

We’ll do this by a series of cases although the last case will not be completely proven.

 

Case 1 :  

We know from Calculus I that  if  and so by Theorem 1 above we also know that  and so the sequence diverges if .

 

Case 2 :  

In this case we have,

                                                      

 

So, the sequence converges for  and in this case its limit is 1.

 

Case 3 :  

We know from Calculus I that  if  and so by Theorem 1 above we also know that  and so the sequence converges if  and in this case its limit is zero.

 

Case 4 :  

In this case we have,

                                                     

 

So, the sequence converges for  and in this case its limit is zero.

 

Case 5 :  

First let’s note that if  then  then by Case 3 above we have,

                                                         

 

Theorem 2 above now tells us that we must also have,  and so if  the sequence converges and has a limit of 0.

 

Case 6 :  

In this case the sequence is,

                                  

and hopefully it is clear that  doesn’t exist.  Recall that in order of this limit to exist the terms must be approaching a single value as n increases.  In this case however the terms just alternate between 1 and -1 and so the limit does not exist.

 

So, the sequence diverges for .

 

Case 7 :  

In this case we’re not going to go through a complete proof.  Let’s just see what happens if we let  for instance.  If we do that the sequence becomes,

                                   

 

So, if  we get a sequence of terms whose values alternate in sign and get larger and larger and so  doesn’t exist.  It does not settle down to a single value as n increases nor do the terms ALL approach infinity.  So, the sequence diverges for .

 

We could do something similar for any value of r such that  and so the sequence diverges for .

Pf_Box

 

 

Let’s take a look at a couple of examples of limits of sequences.

 

Example 2  Determine if the following sequences converge or diverge.  If the sequence converges determine its limit.

(a)    [Solution]

(b)    [Solution]

(c)    [Solution]

(d)    [Solution]

 

 

 

Solution

(a)  

 

In this case all we need to do is recall the method that was developed in Calculus I to deal with the limits of rational functions.  See the Limits At Infinity, Part I section of my Calculus I notes for a review of this if you need to. 

 

To do a limit in this form all we need to do is factor from the numerator and denominator the largest power of n, cancel and then take the limit.

                                   

 

So the sequence converges and its limit is .

[Return to Problems]

 

(b)  

 

We will need to be careful with this one.   We will need to use L’Hospital’s Rule on this sequence.  The problem is that L’Hospital’s Rule only works on functions and not on sequences.  Normally this would be a problem, but we’ve got Theorem 1 from above to help us out.  Let’s define

 

and note that,

 

 

Theorem 1 says that all we need to do is take the limit of the function.

                                                

So, the sequence in this part diverges (to  ).

 

More often than not we just do L’Hospital’s Rule on the sequence terms without first converting to x’s since the work will be identical regardless of whether we use x or n.  However, we really should remember that technically we can’t do the derivatives while dealing with sequence terms.

[Return to Problems]

 

(c)  

 

We will also need to be careful with this sequence.  We might be tempted to just say that the limit of the sequence terms is zero (and we’d be correct).  However, technically we can’t take the limit of sequences whose terms alternate in sign, because we don’t know how to do limits of functions that exhibit that same behavior.  Also, we want to be very careful to not rely too much on intuition with these problems.  As we will see in the next section, and in later sections, our intuition can lead us astray in these problem if we aren’t careful.

 

So, let’s work this one by the book.  We will need to use Theorem 2 on this problem.  To this we’ll first need to compute,

                                                        

 

Therefore, since the limit of the sequence terms with absolute value bars on them goes to zero we know by Theorem 2 that,

                                                               

which also means that the sequence converges to a value of zero.

[Return to Problems]

 

(d)  

 

For this theorem note that all we need to do is realize that this is the sequence in Theorem 3 above using .  So, by Theorem 3 this sequence diverges.

[Return to Problems]

 

We now need to give a warning about misusing Theorem 2.  Theorem 2 only works if the limit is zero.  If the limit of the absolute value of the sequence terms is not zero then the theorem will not hold.  The last part of the previous example is a good example of this (and in fact this warning is the whole reason that part is there).  Notice that

 

 

 and yet,  doesn’t even exist let alone equal 1.  So, be careful using this Theorem 2.  You must always remember that it only works if the limit is zero.

 

Before moving onto the next section we need to give one more theorem that we’ll need for a proof down the road.

 

Theorem 4

For the sequence  if both  and  then  is convergent and .

 

Proof of Theorem 4

Let

 

Then since  there is an  such that if  we know that,

                                                                

Likewise, because  there is an  such that if  we know that,

                                                               

Now, let  and let .  Then either  for some  or  for some  and so in either case we have that,

                                                                 

 

Therefore,  and so  is convergent.

Pf_Box

 


Online Notes / Calculus II (Notes) / Series & Sequences / Sequences

[Contact Me] [Links] [Privacy Statement] [Site Map] [Terms of Use] [Menus by Milonic]

© 2003 - 2014 Paul Dawkins