Paul's Online Math Notes
     
 
Online Notes / Linear Algebra / Vector Spaces / Orthogonal Matrices
Linear Algebra

You can navigate through this E-Book using the menu to the left. For E-Books that have a Chapter/Section organization each option in the menu to the left indicates a chapter and will open a menu showing the sections in that chapter. Alternatively, you can navigate to the next/previous section or chapter by clicking the links in the boxes at the very top and bottom of the material.

Also, depending upon the E-Book, it will be possible to download the complete E-Book, the chapter containing the current section and/or the current section. You can do this be clicking on the E-Book, Chapter, and/or the Section link provided below.

For those pages with mathematics on them you can, in most cases, enlarge the mathematics portion by clicking on the equation. Click the enlarged version to hide it.

In this section we’re going to be talking about a special kind of matrix called an orthogonal matrix.  This is also going to be a fairly short section (at least in relation to many of the other sections in this chapter anyway) to close out the chapter.  We’ll start with the following definition.

 

Definition 1  Let Q be a square matrix and suppose that

                                                                  

then we call Q an orthogonal matrix.

 

Notice that because we need to have an inverse for Q in order for it to be orthogonal we are implicitly assuming that Q is a square matrix here.

 

Before we see any examples of some orthogonal matrices (and we have already seen at least one orthogonal matrix) let’s get a couple of theorems out of the way.

 

Theorem 1 Suppose that Q is a square matrix then Q is orthogonal if and only if .

 

Proof : This is a really simple proof that falls directly from the definition of what it means for a matrix to be orthogonal.

 In this direction we’ll assume that Q is orthogonal and so we know that , but this promptly tells us that,

 

 

 In this direction we’ll assume that , since this is exactly what is needed to show that we have an inverse we can see that  and so Q is orthogonal.

Pf_Box

 

The next theorem gives us an easier check for a matrix being orthogonal.

 

Theorem 2 Suppose that Q is an  matrix, then the following are all equivalent.

(a) Q is orthogonal.

(b) The columns of Q are an orthonormal set of vectors in  under the standard Euclidean inner product.

(c) The rows of Q are an orthonormal set of vectors in  under the standard Euclidean inner product.

 

Proof : We’ve actually done most of this proof already.  Normally in this kind of theorem we’d prove a loop of equivalences such as .  However, in this case if we prove  and  we can get the above loop of equivalences by default and it will be much easier to prove the two equivalences as we’ll see.

 

The equivalence  is directly given by Theorem 2 from the previous section since that theorem is in fact a more general version of this equivalence.

 

The proof of the equivalence  is nearly identical to the proof of Theorem 2 from the previous section and so we’ll leave it to you to fill in the details.

Pf_Box

 

Since it is much easier to verify that the columns/rows of a matrix or orthonormal than it is to check  in general this theorem will be useful for identifying orthogonal matrices.

 

As noted above, in order for a matrix to be an orthogonal matrix it must be square.  So a matrix that is not square, but does have orthonormal columns will not be orthogonal.  Also, note that we did mean to say that the columns are orthonormal.  This may seem odd given that we call the matrix “orthogonal” when “orthonormal” would probably be a better name for the matrix, but traditionally this kind of matrix has been called orthogonal and so we’ll keep up with tradition.

 

In the previous section we were finding QR-Decompositions and if you recall the matrix Q had columns that were a set of orthonormal vectors and so if Q is a square matrix then it will also be an orthogonal matrix, while if it isn’t square then it won’t be an orthogonal matrix.

 

At this point we should probably do an example or two.

 

Example 1  Here are the QR-Decompositions that we performed in the previous section.

 

From Example 1

                    

 

From Example 2

         

 

In the first case the matrix Q is,

                                                     

and by construction this matrix has orthonormal columns and since it is a square matrix it is an orthogonal matrix.

 

In the second case the matrix Q is,

                                                

Again, by construction this matrix has orthonormal columns.  However, since it is not a square matrix it is NOT an orthogonal matrix.

 

Example 2  Find value(s) for a, b, and c for which the following matrix will be orthogonal.

                                                       

Solution

So, the columns of Q are,

                              

 

We will leave it to you to verify that ,  and  and so all we need to do if find a, b, and c for which we will have ,  and .

 

Let’s start with the two dot products and see what we get.

                                                   

From the first dot product we can see that, .  Plugging this into the second dot product gives us, .  Using the fact that we now know what c is in terms of a and plugging this into  we can see that

 

Now, using the above work we now know that in order for the third column to be orthogonal (since we haven’t even touched orthonormal yet) it must be in the form,

                                                                  

 

Finally, we need to make sure that then third column has norm of 1.  In other words we need to require that , or we can require that  since we know that the norm must be a positive quantity here.  So, let’s compute , set it equal to one and see what we get.

                 

 

This gives us two possible values of a that we can use and this in turn means that we could used either of the following two vectors for  

                                  

 

A natural question is why do we care about orthogonal matrices?  The following theorem gives some very nice properties of orthogonal matrices.

 

Theorem 3 If Q is an  matrix then the following are all equivalent.

(a) Q is orthogonal.

(b)  for all x in .  This is often called preserving norms.

(c)  for all x and all y in .  This is often called preserving dot products.

 

Proof : We’ll prove this set of statements in the order :