You can navigate through this E-Book using the menu to the left. For E-Books that have a Chapter/Section organization each option in the menu to the left indicates a chapter and will open a menu showing the sections in that chapter. Alternatively, you can navigate to the next/previous section or chapter by clicking the links in the boxes at the very top and bottom of the material.
Also, depending upon the E-Book, it will be possible to download the complete E-Book, the chapter containing the current section and/or the current section. You can do this be clicking on the E-Book, Chapter, and/or the Section link provided below.
For those pages with mathematics on them you can, in most cases, enlarge the mathematics portion by clicking on the equation. Click the enlarged version to hide it.
Let’s go back to the previous section for a second and
examine Example 1 and Example 6. In Example 1 we saw that 
was a vector space with the standard addition
and scalar multiplication for any positive integer n. So, in particular 
is a vector space with the standard addition
and scalar multiplication. In Example 6
we saw that the set of points on a line through the origin in 
with the standard addition and vector space
multiplication was also a vector space.
So, just what is so important about these two examples? Well first notice that they both are using
the same addition and scalar multiplication.
In and of itself that isn’t important, but it will be important for the
end result of what we want to discus here.
Next, the set of points in the vector space of Example 6 are also in the
set of points in the vector space of Example 1.
While it’s not important to the discussion here note that the opposite
isn’t true, given a line we can find points in 
that aren’t on the line.


What we’ve seen here is that, at least for some vector spaces,
it is possible to take certain subsets of the original vector space and as long
as we retain the definition of addition and scalar multiplication we will get a
new vector space. Of course, it is
possible for some subsets to not be a new vector space. To see an example of this see Example 7 from the previous section. In that example we’ve got a subset of 
with the standard addition and scalar
multiplication and yet it’s not a vector space.
We want to investigate this idea in more detail and we’ll
start off with the following definition.
|
Definition 1 Suppose
that V is a vector space and W is a subset of V. If, under the addition
and scalar multiplication that is defined on V, W is also a vector
space then we call W a subspace of V.
|
Now, technically if we wanted to show that a subset W of a vector space V was a subspace we’d need to show that all 10 of the axioms from
the definition of a vector space are
valid, however, in reality that doesn’t need to be done.
Many of the axioms (c,
d, g, h, i, and j) deal with how addition and scalar multiplication work, but W is inheriting the definition of
addition and scalar multiplication from V. Therefore, since elements of W are also elements of V the six axioms listed above are
guaranteed to be valid on W.
The only ones that we really need to worry about are the
remaining four, all of which require something to be in the subset W.
The first two (a, and b) are the closure axioms that require
that the sum of any two elements from W
is back in W and that the scalar
multiple of any element from W will
be back in W. Note that the sum and scalar multiple will
be in V we just don’t know if it will
be in W. We also need to verify that the zero vector
(axiom e) is in W and that each element of W
has a negative that is also in W
(axiom f).
As the following theorem shows however, the only two axioms
that we really need to worry about are the two closure axioms. Once we have those two axioms valid, we will
get the zero vector and negative vector for free.
|
Theorem 1 Suppose
that W is a non-empty (i.e. at least one element in it)
subset of the vector space V then W will be a subspace if the following
two conditions are true.
(a) If
u and v are in W then  is also in W (i.e. W is closed under addition).
(b) If
u is in W and c is any scalar
then cu is also in W (i.e. W is closed under scalar multiplication).
Where the definition of addition and scalar multiplication
on W are the same as on V.
|
Proof : To prove
this theorem all we need to do is show that if we assume the two closure axioms
are valid the other 8 axioms will be given to us for free. As we discussed above the axioms c, d,
g, h, i, and j are true simply based on the fact
that W is a subset of V and it uses the same addition and
scalar multiplication and so we get these for free.
We only need to verify that assuming the two closure
condition we get axioms e and f as well. From the second condition above we see that
we are assuming that W is closed
under scalar multiplication and so both 0u
and 
must be in W,
but from Theorem 1 from the previous
section we know that,
But this means that the zero vector and the negative of u must be in W and so we’re done.

Be careful with this proof.
On the surface it may look like we never used the first condition of
closure under addition and we didn’t use that to show that axioms e and f were valid. However, in
order for W to be a vector space it
must be closed under addition and so without that first condition we can’t know
whether or not W is in fact a vector
space. Therefore, even though we didn’t
explicitly use it in the proof it was required in order to guarantee that we
have a vector space.
Next we should acknowledge the following fact.
Fact
|
Every vector space, V,
has at least two subspaces. Namely, V itself and  (the zero space).
|
Because V can be
thought of as a subset of itself we can also think of it as a subspace of
itself. Also, the zero space which is
the vector space consisting only of the zero vector, 
is a subset of V and is a vector space in its own right and so will be a subspace
of V.
At this point we should probably take a look at some
examples. In all of these examples we
assume that the standard addition and scalar multiplication are being used in
each case unless otherwise stated.
|
Example 1 Determine
if the given set is a subspace of the given vector space.
(a) Let
W be the set of all points,  ,
from  in which  . Is this a subspace of  ? [Solution]
(b) Let
W be the set of all points from  of the form  . Is this a subspace of  ? [Solution]
(c) Let
W be the set of all points from  of the form  . Is this a subspace of  ? [Solution]
Solution
In each of these cases we need to show either that the set
is closed under addition and scalar multiplication or it is not closed for at
least one of those.
(a) Let W be the set of all points,  , from  in
which  .
Is this a subspace of  ?
This set is closed under addition because,

and since  we also have  and so the resultant point is back in W.
However, this set is not closed under scalar
multiplication. Let c be any negative scalar and further assume that  then,

Then because  and  we must have  and so the resultant point is not in W because the first component is
neither zero nor positive.
Therefore, W is
not a subspace of V.
[Return to Problems]
(b) Let W be the set of all points from  of
the form  .
Is this a subspace of  ?
This one is fairly simple to check a point will be in W if the first component is zero. So, let  and  be any two points in W and let c be any
scalar then,

So, both  and cx are in W and so W is closed
under addition and scalar multiplication and so W is a subspace.
[Return to Problems]
(c) Let W be the set of all points from  of
the form  .
Is this a subspace of  ?
This one is here just to keep us from making any
assumptions based on the previous part.
This set is closed under neither addition nor scalar
multiplication. In order for points to
be in W in this case the first
component must be a 1. However, if  and  be any two points in W and let c be any
scalar other than 1 we get,

Neither of which is in W
and so W is not a subspace.
[Return to Problems]
|




















































