*i.e.*you are probably on a mobile phone). Due to the nature of the mathematics on this site it is best views in landscape mode. If your device is not in landscape mode many of the equations will run off the side of your device (should be able to scroll to see them) and some of the menu items will be cut off due to the narrow screen width.

### Section 7.7 : Integration Strategy

We’ve now seen a fair number of different integration techniques and so we should probably pause at this point and talk a little bit about a strategy to use for determining the correct technique to use when faced with an integral.

There are a couple of points that need to be made about this strategy. First, it isn’t a hard and fast set of rules for determining the method that should be used. It is really nothing more than a general set of guidelines that will help us to identify techniques that may work. Some integrals can be done in more than one way and so depending on the path you take through the strategy you may end up with a different technique than somebody else who also went through this strategy.

Second, while the strategy is presented as a way to identify the technique that could be used on an integral also keep in mind that, for many integrals, it can also automatically exclude certain techniques as well. When going through the strategy keep two lists in mind. The first list is integration techniques that simply won’t work and the second list is techniques that look like they might work. After going through the strategy and the second list has only one entry then that is the technique to use. If, on the other hand, there is more than one possible technique to use we will then have to decide on which is liable to be the best for us to use. Unfortunately, there is no way to teach which technique is the best as that usually depends upon the person and which technique they find to be the easiest.

Third, don’t forget that many integrals can be evaluated in multiple ways and so more than one technique may be used on it. This has already been mentioned in each of the previous points but is important enough to warrant a separate mention. Sometimes one technique will be significantly easier than the others and so don’t just stop at the first technique that appears to work. Always identify all possible techniques and then go back and determine which you feel will be the easiest for you to use.

Next, it’s entirely possible that you will need to use more than one method to completely do an integral. For instance, a substitution may lead to using integration by parts or partial fractions integral.

Finally, in my class I will accept any valid integration technique as a solution. As already noted there is often more than one way to do an integral and just because I find one technique to be the easiest doesn’t mean that you will as well. So, in my class, there is no one right way of doing an integral. You may use any integration technique that I’ve taught you in this class or you learned in Calculus I to evaluate integrals in this class. In other words, always take the approach that you find to be the easiest.

Note that this final point is more geared towards my class and it’s completely possible that your instructor may not agree with this and so be careful in applying this point if you aren’t in my class.

Okay, let’s get on with the strategy.

**Simplify the integrand, if possible.**This step is very important in the integration process. Many integrals can be taken from impossible or very difficult to very easy with a little simplification or manipulation. Don’t forget basic trig and algebraic identities as these can often be used to simplify the integral.We used this idea when we were looking at integrals involving trig functions. For example, consider the following integral.

\[\int{{{{\cos }^2}x\,dx}}\]This integral can’t be done as is, however simply by recalling the identity,

\[{\cos ^2}x = \frac{1}{2}\left( {1 + \cos \left( {2x} \right)} \right)\]the integral becomes very easy to do.

Note that this example also shows that simplification does not necessarily mean that we’ll write the integrand in a “simpler” form. It only means that we’ll write the integrand into a form that we can deal with and this is often longer and/or “messier” than the original integral.

**See if a “simple” substitution will work.**Look to see if a simple substitution can be used instead of the often more complicated methods from Calculus II. For example, consider both of the following integrals. \[\int{{\frac{x}{{{x^2} - 1}}\,dx}}\hspace{0.5in}\hspace{0.25in}\int{{x\sqrt {{x^2} - 1} \,dx}}\]The first integral can be done with partial fractions and the second could be done with a trig substitution.

However, both could also be evaluated using the substitution \(u = {x^2} - 1\) and the work involved in the substitution would be significantly less than the work involved in either partial fractions or trig substitution.

So, always look for quick, simple substitutions before moving on to the more complicated Calculus II techniques.

**Identify the type of integral.**Note that any integral may fall into more than one of these types. Because of this fact it’s usually best to go all the way through the list and identify all possible types since one may be easier than the other and it’s entirely possible that the easier type is listed lower in the list.- Is the integrand a rational expression (
*i.e*is the integrand a polynomial divided by a polynomial)? If so, then partial fractions may work on the integral. - Is the integrand a polynomial times a trig function, exponential, or logarithm? If so, then integration by parts may work.
- Is the integrand a product of sines and cosines, secant and tangents, or cosecants and cotangents? If so, then the topics from the second section may work.

Likewise, don’t forget that some quotients involving these functions can also be done using these techniques. - Does the integrand involve \(\sqrt {{b^2}{x^2} + {a^2}} \), \(\sqrt {{b^2}{x^2} - {a^2}} \), or \(\sqrt {{a^2} - {b^2}{x^2}} \)? If so, then a trig substitution might work nicely.
- Does the integrand have roots other than those listed above in it? If so, then the substitution \(u = \sqrt[n]{{g\left( x \right)}}\) might work.
- Does the integrand have a quadratic in it? If so, then completing the square on the quadratic might put it into a form that we can deal with.

- Is the integrand a rational expression (
**Can we relate the integral to an integral we already know how to do?**In other words, can we use a substitution or manipulation to write the integrand into a form that does fit into the forms we’ve looked at previously in this chapter.typical example here is the following integral.

\[\int{{\cos x\sqrt {1 + {{\sin }^2}x} \,dx}}\]This integral doesn’t obviously fit into any of the forms we looked at in this chapter. However, with the substitution \(u = \sin x\) we can reduce the integral to the form,

\[\int{{\sqrt {1 + {u^2}} \,du}}\]which is a trig substitution problem.

**Do we need to use multiple techniques?**In this step we need to ask ourselves if it is possible that we’ll need to use multiple techniques. The example in the previous part is a good example. Using a substitution didn’t allow us to actually do the integral. All it did was put the integral and put it into a form that we could use a different technique on.Don’t ever get locked into the idea that an integral will only require one step to completely evaluate it. Many will require more than one step.

**Try again.**If everything that you’ve tried to this point doesn’t work then go back through the process and try again. This time try a technique that you didn’t use the first time around.

As noted above this strategy is not a hard and fast set of rules. It is only intended to guide you through the process of best determining how to do any given integral. Note as well that the only place Calculus II actually arises is in the third step. Steps 1, 2 and 4 involve nothing more than manipulation of the integrand either through direct manipulation of the integrand or by using a substitution. The last two steps are simply ideas to think about in going through this strategy.

Many students go through this process and concentrate almost exclusively on Step 3 (after all this is Calculus II, so it’s easy to see why they might do that….) to the exclusion of the other steps. One very large consequence of that exclusion is that often a simple manipulation or substitution is overlooked that could make the integral very easy to do.

Before moving on to the next section we should work a couple of quick problems illustrating a couple of not so obvious simplifications/manipulations and a not so obvious substitution.

This integral almost falls into the form given in **3c**. It is a quotient of tangent and secant and we know that sometimes we can use the same methods for products of tangents and secants on quotients.

The process from that section tells us that if we have even powers of secant to strip two of them off and convert the rest to tangents. That won’t work here. We can split two secants off, but they would be in the denominator and they won’t do us any good there. Remember that the point of splitting them off is so they would be there for the substitution \(u = \tan x\). That requires them to be in the numerator. So, that won’t work and so we’ll have to find another solution method.

There are in fact two solution methods to this integral depending on how you want to go about it. We’ll take a look at both.

*Solution 1*

In this solution method we could just convert everything to sines and cosines and see if that gives us an integral we can deal with.

Note that just converting to sines and cosines won’t always work and if it does it won’t always work this nicely. Often there will be a lot more work that would need to be done to complete the integral.

*Solution 2*

This solution method goes back to dealing with secants and tangents. Let’s notice that if we had a secant in the numerator we could just use \(u = \sec x\) as a substitution and it would be a fairly quick and simple substitution to use. We don’t have a secant in the numerator. However, we could very easily get a secant in the numerator simply by multiplying the numerator and denominator by secant.

In the previous example we saw two “simplifications” that allowed us to do the integral. The first was using identities to rewrite the integral into terms we could deal with and the second involved multiplying the numerator and the denominator by something to again put the integral into terms we could deal with.

Using identities to rewrite an integral is an important “simplification” and we should not forget about it. Integrals can often be greatly simplified or at least put into a form that can be dealt with by using an identity.

The second “simplification” is not used as often, but does show up on occasion so again, it’s best to not forget about it. In fact, let’s take another look at an example in which multiplying the numerator and denominator by something will allow us to do an integral.

This is an integral in which if we just concentrate on the third step we won’t get anywhere. This integral doesn’t appear to be any of the kinds of integrals that we worked in this chapter.

We can do the integral however, if we do the following,

\[\begin{align*}\int{{\frac{1}{{1 + \sin x}}\,dx}} & = \int{{\frac{1}{{1 + \sin x}}\frac{{1 - \sin x}}{{1 - \sin x}}\,dx}}\\ & = \int{{\frac{{1 - \sin x}}{{1 - {{\sin }^2}x}}\,dx}}\end{align*}\]This does not appear to have done anything for us. However, if we now remember the first “simplification” we looked at above we will notice that we can use an identity to rewrite the denominator. Once we do that we can further reduce the integral into something we can deal with.

\[\begin{align*}\int{{\frac{1}{{1 + \sin x}}\,dx}} & = \int{{\frac{{1 - \sin x}}{{{{\cos }^2}x}}\,dx}}\\ & = \int{{\frac{1}{{{{\cos }^2}x}} - \frac{{\sin x}}{{\cos x}}\frac{1}{{\cos x}}\,dx}}\\ & = \int{{{{\sec }^2}x - \tan x\sec x\,dx}}\\ & = \tan x - \sec x + c\end{align*}\]So, we’ve seen once again that multiplying the numerator and denominator by something can put the integral into a form that we can integrate. Notice as well that this example also showed that “simplifications” do not necessarily put an integral into a simpler form. They only put the integral into a form that is easier to integrate.

Let’s now take a quick look at an example of a substitution that is not so obvious.

We introduced this example saying that the substitution was not so obvious. However, this is really an integral that falls into the form given by 3e in our strategy above. However, many people miss that form and so don’t think about it. So, let’s try the following substitution.

\[u = \sqrt x \hspace{0.5in}x = {u^2}\hspace{0.5in}dx = 2u\,du\]With this substitution the integral becomes,

\[\int{{\cos \left( {\sqrt x } \right)\,dx}} = 2\int{{u\cos u\,du}}\]This is now an integration by parts integral. Remember that often we will need to use more than one technique to completely do the integral. This is a fairly simple integration by parts problem so we’ll leave the remainder of the details to you to check.

\[\int{{\cos \left( {\sqrt x } \right)\,dx}} = 2\left( {\cos \left( {\sqrt x } \right) + \sqrt x \,\sin \left( {\sqrt x } \right)} \right) + c\]Before leaving this section we should also point out that there are integrals out there in the world that just can’t be done in terms of functions that we know. Some examples of these are.

\[\int{{{{\bf{e}}^{ - {x^2}}}\,dx}}\hspace{0.5in}\int{{\cos \left( {{x^2}} \right)\,dx}}\hspace{0.5in}\int{{\frac{{\sin \left( x \right)}}{x}\,dx}}\hspace{0.5in}\int{{\cos \left( {{{\bf{e}}^x}} \right)\,dx}}\]That doesn’t mean that these integrals can’t be done at some level. If you go to a computer algebra system such as Maple or Mathematica and have it do these integrals it will return the following.

\[\begin{align*}\int{{{{\bf{e}}^{ - {x^2}}}\,dx}} & = \frac{{\sqrt \pi }}{2}{\mathop{\rm erf}\nolimits} \left( x \right)\\ \int{{\cos \left( {{x^2}} \right)\,dx}} & = \sqrt {\frac{\pi }{2}} {\mathop{\rm FresnelC}\nolimits} \left( {x\sqrt {\frac{2}{\pi }} } \right)\\ \int{{\frac{{\sin \left( x \right)}}{x}\,dx}} & = {\mathop{\rm Si}\nolimits} \left( x \right)\\ \int{{\cos \left( {{{\bf{e}}^x}} \right)\,dx}} & = {\mathop{\rm Ci}\nolimits} \left( {{{\bf{e}}^x}} \right)\end{align*}\]So, it appears that these integrals can in fact be done. However, this is a little misleading. Here are the definitions of each of the functions given above.

**Error Function**

**The Sine Integral**

**The Fresnel Cosine Integral**

**The Cosine Integral**

Where \(\gamma \) is the Euler-Mascheroni constant.

Note that the first three are simply defined in terms of themselves and so when we say we can integrate them all we are really doing is renaming the integral. The fourth one is a little different and yet it is still defined in terms of an integral that can’t be done in practice.

It will be possible to integrate every integral given in this class, but it is important to note that there are integrals that just can’t be done. We should also note that after we look at Series we will be able to write down series representations of each of the integrals above.