Section 2.6 : Infinite Limits
4. For g(x)=x+7x2−4 evaluate,
- limx→2−g(x)
- limx→2+g(x)
- limx→2g(x)
Show All Solutions Hide All Solutions
a limx→2−g(x) Show SolutionLet’s start off by acknowledging that for x→2− we know x<2.
For the numerator we can see that, in the limit, we will get 9.
Now let’s take care of the denominator. First, we know that if we square a number less than 2 (and greater than -2, which it is safe to assume we have here because we’re doing the limit) we will get a number that is less than 4 and so, in the limit, we will have,
x2−4→0−So, in the limit, the numerator is approaching a positive number and the denominator is an increasingly small negative number. The quotient must then be an increasing large negative number or,
limx→2−x+7x2−4=−∞Note that this also means that there is a vertical asymptote at x=2.
b limx→2+g(x) Show Solution
Let’s start off by acknowledging that for x→2+ we know x>2.
For the numerator we can see that, in the limit, we will get 9.
Now let’s take care of the denominator. First, we know that if we square a number greater than 2 we will get a number that is greater than 4 and so, in the limit, we will have,
x2−4→0+So, in the limit, the numerator is approaching a positive number and the denominator is an increasingly small positive number. The quotient must then be an increasing large positive number or,
limx→2+x+7x2−4=∞Note that this also means that there is a vertical asymptote at x=2, which we already knew from the first part.
c limx→2g(x) Show Solution
In this case we can see from the first two parts that,
limx→2−g(x)≠limx→2+g(x)and so, from our basic limit properties we can see that limx→2g(x) does not exist.
For the sake of completeness and to verify the answers for this problem here is a quick sketch of the function.

As we’re sure that you had already noticed there would be another vertical asymptote at x=−2 for this function. For the practice you might want to make sure that you can also do the limits for that point.